Difference Between Serverless and Function-as-a-Service

Understanding serverless vs function as a service. Serverless computing, as the name implies, is a computing approach in which service providers maintain infrastructure orchestration. With the advent of cloud computing, customers may instantly construct any service instance, scale it up or down, and discard it as needed, reducing CapEx and OpEx while removing the need to manage actual hardware.

In a conventional situation, we would have first to supply all of the underlying resources, such as networks and security groups, before we could provision computing instances. Then we'll need to install and set up the SQL database and administer the infrastructure on an ongoing basis. With a serverless solution, we can construct a SQL server in a few clicks that can automatically grow based on system traffic without requiring users to maintain any infrastructure.

What is FaaS?

Function as a Service is a recent idea that attempts to provide developers with the ability to simply construct software functions in a cloud setting. The developers will still build the application logic in this approach, but the code will be run on stateless compute instances maintained by the cloud provider. FaaS is an event-driven computing style in which functions are set off by an event like HTTP requests, message queues, and so on.

Pros and Cons of FaaS vs. Serverless

Ok. We comprehend the distinctions between the various types of services. Let us now examine their pros and cons.

Advantages of Serverless Computing

• There are no infrastructure configurations.
• Most choices feature auto-scaling, allowing for virtually limitless extension.
• Savings over standard server-based setups
• Ease of long-term administration because the service provider handles all upgrades, security, and optimizations.

Disadvantages of Serverless

• Loss of fine-grained control since the cloud provider manages all infrastructure and customers have no access to backend infrastructure for bespoke customizations.
• Loss of characteristics. Some serverless apps will be unavailable to end users due to a lack of specific setups.
• This is especially true when working with serverless database applications, as several functionality that are accessible in traditional database deployments may not be available in serverless versions.
• Depending on the use case, this might be costly. However, dedicated servers may be more cost-effective if you are working with large data sets or data requests.

Benefits of FaaS

• Simple to use. There is no need to create whole apps. You may easily write and deploy the appropriate functional component.
• OpEx reduction. You only have to pay when the function is performed because the FaaS service model is based on a usage-based pricing model. This can significantly cut operational costs.
• Function scalability and efficiency. Functions enable users to easily scale up or down and supply various functions to satisfy any user demand without affecting the application's functionality.

Disadvantages of FaaS

• Complex functions in a single function are not appropriate. The goal of functions is to create simple functions that do a particular purpose.
• More tooling is possible. Managing a significant number of functions will necessitate the use of third-party management solutions.
• Data storage has been added. Because the functions are stateless, stateful services must be supported by independent data stores outside of the functions.

Serverless seeks to remove administrative and setup responsibilities, allowing users to focus only on the application. This is not restricted to server instances but also extends to other areas.

Related Articles

Explore More Special Offers

  1. Short Message Service(SMS) & Mail Service

    50,000 email package starts as low as USD 1.99, 120 short messages start at only USD 1.00

phone Contact Us